Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ted Holzman's avatar

I agree with everything you said, but for me it’s important to elaborate on empathy. Most quotidian speech is formulaic: you go to the bank or restaurant and you engage vocal and behavior machines. This is why so many human interactions can be emulated by AIs; the emulation is algorithmic. Poetry fights against this. It wakes us up. As you wrote, it renews the world for us. Most importantly, it opens a portal to another mind. I can feel Ovid’s jovial and slightly patronizing whimsy; I can feel T. S. Eliot’s morose struggle with religion or E. E. Cummings’ delighted sexuality, or how totally blown away and ecstatic Emily Dickinson was when she walked through a garden. You can’t reduce these poets to abstractions, their work makes them live vividly in our heads. And that’s *really* important. As Housman wrote in “Terence, this is Stupid Stuff” (which is, at least in part an apology for poetry) “It should do good to heart and head when your soul is in my soul’s stead”. Engagement, empathy, seeing through another’s eyes, is one of the greatest gifts of poetry.

Expand full comment
Daniel Puzzo's avatar

This was lovely, and such an important message. Are you familiar with '4,000 Weeks' by Oliver Burkeman? He shares an interesting exercise he tried, I believe it's something that students at art school in Harvard (maybe?) are required to do. He went to a gallery or museum and had to sit and look at one piece of art for something like 4 hours without any interruptions, no phones, no reading, no notes, just to sit and gaze and immerse yourself. Talk about taking things slow! I've considered doing something similar.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts